methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Failure Mode and Effects Analysis
Operations
Failure Mode and Effects Analysis
Paper illustration for Ideal Days.
Agile
Ideal Days
Paper illustration of a yellow story card, blue rule cards, green example cards and a red question card on a light workspace.
Agile
Example Mapping
Paper illustration for Dot Estimation.
Facilitation
Dot Estimation
Purposedifferent
For a process, product, or service with noticeable failure risks, the method assesses possible failure modes in advance. It directs attention to combinations of occurrence, effect, and detectability.When effort needs to be thought of as real working time, it offers a simple common denominator for comparison. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as Ideal Day Estimates, Assumption Notes, and Capacity Caveats.When a story carries business rules and exceptions, it brings clarity before implementation. It makes examples, open questions, and boundaries visible enough that the logic becomes jointly sound.When size or effort can only be estimated roughly, Dot Estimation condenses the group's experience into a quick range. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as an Effort Heatmap, Risk Signals, and Discussion Targets.
Complexitydifferent
HighLowLowLow
Timedifferent
2-6 h15-60 min30-60 min5-20 min
Participantsdifferent
3-102-93-73-20
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
FMEA Table, Risk Priority, Mitigation ActionsIdeal Day Estimates, Assumption Notes, Capacity CaveatsExample Map, Acceptance Criteria, Open QuestionsEffort Heatmap, Risk Signals, Discussion Targets
Tagsno overlap
RiskQualityOperationsRoot cause
EstimationEffortAgile
Behavior-Driven DevelopmentRequirementsExamplesRefinement
EstimationEffortRisk
Add more methods