methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Failure Mode and Effects Analysis
Operations
Failure Mode and Effects Analysis
Paper illustration for ALPEN Method
Operations
ALPEN Method
Paper illustration for Standard Work Analysis.
Operations
Standard Work Analysis
Paper fishbone diagram with a measurable effect at the head and six labeled cause branches.
Operations
Fishbone Diagram
Purposedifferent
For a process, product, or service with noticeable failure risks, the method assesses possible failure modes in advance. It directs attention to combinations of occurrence, effect, and detectability.With an overloaded day full of too many tasks, a realistic picture of the day emerges. The method connects estimating, deciding, and buffer thinking so planning fits available energy and time.When the same task is done differently depending on the person, the method exposes the reliable core. It creates comparability without unnecessarily choking off needed latitude.When a problem has several possible contributing factors, the method sorts causes by cause areas. It prevents an initial hunch from blocking the view of other plausible drivers.
Complexitydifferent
HighLowMediumLow
Timedifferent
2-6 h10-20 min daily1-3 h30-60 min
Participantsdifferent
3-1012-62-8
Formatdifferent
WorkshopAsyncWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
FMEA Table, Risk Priority, Mitigation ActionsDaily Plan, Time Estimates, Review NotesStandard Work Sheet, Deviation List, Improved Standard, Training NeedsFishbone Diagram, Cause Categories, Investigation Backlog
Tagsno overlap
RiskQualityOperationsRoot cause
PlanningTime managementProductivityOperations
LeanProcessQuality
Root causeQualityOperations
Add more methods