methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Failure Mode and Effects Analysis
Operations
Failure Mode and Effects Analysis
Paper illustration for ALPEN Method
Operations
ALPEN Method
Paper fishbone diagram with a measurable effect at the head and six labeled cause branches.
Operations
Fishbone Diagram
Paper illustration for Fault Tree Analysis.
Operations
Fault Tree Analysis
Purposedifferent
For a process, product, or service with noticeable failure risks, the method assesses possible failure modes in advance. It directs attention to combinations of occurrence, effect, and detectability.With an overloaded day full of too many tasks, a realistic picture of the day emerges. The method connects estimating, deciding, and buffer thinking so planning fits available energy and time.When a problem has several possible contributing factors, the method sorts causes by cause areas. It prevents an initial hunch from blocking the view of other plausible drivers.For a critical top event with several possible triggers, the method logically models failure paths. It makes visible which combinations of conditions can lead to damage.
Complexitydifferent
HighLowLowHigh
Timedifferent
2-6 h10-20 min daily30-60 min2-6 h
Participantsdifferent
3-1012-83-8
Formatdifferent
WorkshopAsyncWorkshopWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
FMEA Table, Risk Priority, Mitigation ActionsDaily Plan, Time Estimates, Review NotesFishbone Diagram, Cause Categories, Investigation BacklogFault Tree, Critical Paths, Cause Hypotheses, Control Actions
Tagsno overlap
RiskQualityOperationsRoot cause
PlanningTime managementProductivityOperations
Root causeQualityOperations
RiskRoot causeSafety
Add more methods