View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Facilitation Fishbowl Discussion | ![]() Facilitation Troika Consulting | ![]() Facilitation Open Space Technology | ![]() Knowledge Modeling Peer Instruction |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a controversial topic needs depth and discipline at the same time, Fishbowl Discussion makes the structure of the conversation transparent. The format keeps the core small enough for real dialogue and open enough for controlled turnover. | When someone needs to sort out a concrete work problem, Troika Consulting offers fast peer consulting with a tight focus. The method brings perspectives together without taking responsibility out of the person's hands. | When a complex topic does not yet have a fitting agenda, Open Space Technology hands topic ownership back to the participants. The format suits questions that only move forward when real interest determines the order. | Peer Instruction uses group thinking to clarify difficult terms or concepts faster. The method combines individual reflection with social correction and shared precision. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | High | Medium |
Timedifferent | 45-90 min | 30-45 min | 0.5-2 Tage | 10-20 min je Frage |
Participantsdifferent | 8-80 | 3-30 | 20-500+ | 6-50 |
Formatsame | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Discussion Insights, Observed Tensions, Follow-up Questions | Advice Notes, Next Actions, Peer Insights | Session Marketplace, Proceedings, Action Topics | Concept Questions, Vote Results, Learning Notes |
Tags1 shared | FacilitationDialogueLarge group | FacilitationCoachingLearning | FacilitationLarge groupAutonomy | LearningDialogueFacilitation |



