methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Fishbowl Discussion.
Facilitation
Fishbowl Discussion
Paper illustration for Troika Consulting.
Facilitation
Troika Consulting
Paper illustration for Open Space Technology.
Facilitation
Open Space Technology
Paper illustration for Peer Instruction.
Knowledge Modeling
Peer Instruction
Purposedifferent
When a controversial topic needs depth and discipline at the same time, Fishbowl Discussion makes the structure of the conversation transparent. The format keeps the core small enough for real dialogue and open enough for controlled turnover.When someone needs to sort out a concrete work problem, Troika Consulting offers fast peer consulting with a tight focus. The method brings perspectives together without taking responsibility out of the person's hands.When a complex topic does not yet have a fitting agenda, Open Space Technology hands topic ownership back to the participants. The format suits questions that only move forward when real interest determines the order.Peer Instruction uses group thinking to clarify difficult terms or concepts faster. The method combines individual reflection with social correction and shared precision.
Complexitydifferent
MediumLowHighMedium
Timedifferent
45-90 min30-45 min0.5-2 Tage10-20 min je Frage
Participantsdifferent
8-803-3020-500+6-50
Formatsame
WorkshopWorkshopWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Discussion Insights, Observed Tensions, Follow-up QuestionsAdvice Notes, Next Actions, Peer InsightsSession Marketplace, Proceedings, Action TopicsConcept Questions, Vote Results, Learning Notes
Tags1 shared
FacilitationDialogueLarge group
FacilitationCoachingLearning
FacilitationLarge groupAutonomy
LearningDialogueFacilitation
Add more methods