View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Facilitation Fishbowl Discussion |  Product Discovery Jobs to Be Done |  Facilitation Lean Coffee |  Product Discovery Opportunity Scoring |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a controversial topic needs depth and discipline at the same time, Fishbowl Discussion makes the structure of the conversation transparent. The format keeps the core small enough for real dialogue and open enough for controlled turnover. | When switching motives and progress are unclear, it reconstructs the situation from real customer circumstances. It shows why a switch happens and what kind of progress is being sought. | When a group without a fixed agenda needs to get into useful conversations quickly, Lean Coffee structures the start around interests rather than a presentation. The group itself negotiates which topics get time first and which wait. | When opportunities need ranking by their effect, it makes importance and satisfaction directly comparable. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence. The result is captured as an opportunity-score table and top outcomes. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 45-90 min | 1-3 Wochen | 30-90 min | 60-120 min |
Participantsdifferent | 8-80 | 5-12 Interviews | 3-20 | 3-6 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Discussion Insights, Observed Tensions, Follow-up Questions | Job Stories, Outcome Statements, Opportunity List | Prioritized Topics, Discussion Notes, Action Items | Opportunity Score Table, Top Outcomes |
Tagsno overlap | FacilitationDialogueLarge group | CustomerOutcomesNeeds | FacilitationAutonomyDialogue | PrioritizationDiscoveryOutcomesNeeds |