View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Operations Fishbone Diagram |  Agile Specification by Example |  Operations Fault Tree Analysis |  Agile Example Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a problem has several possible contributing factors, the method sorts causes by cause areas. It prevents an initial hunch from blocking the view of other plausible drivers. | When business rules need to become precise, it ties language, example, and test together. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as an Example Table and Acceptance Tests. | For a critical top event with several possible triggers, the method logically models failure paths. It makes visible which combinations of conditions can lead to damage. | When a story carries business rules and exceptions, it brings clarity before implementation. It makes examples, open questions, and boundaries visible enough that the logic becomes jointly sound. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | High | Low |
Timedifferent | 30-60 min | 60-90 min pro Feature | 2-6 h | 30-60 min |
Participantsdifferent | 2-8 | 3-6 | 3-8 | 3-7 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Fishbone Diagram, Cause Categories, Investigation Backlog | Example Table, Acceptance Tests | Fault Tree, Critical Paths, Cause Hypotheses, Control Actions | Example Map, Acceptance Criteria, Open Questions |
Tagsno overlap | Root causeQualityOperations | AgileRequirementsExamplesBehavior-Driven Development | RiskRoot causeSafety | Behavior-Driven DevelopmentRequirementsExamplesRefinement |