View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Operations Fishbone Diagram |  Agile Example Mapping |  Operations Failure Mode and Effects Analysis |  Agile Specification by Example |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a problem has several possible contributing factors, the method sorts causes by cause areas. It prevents an initial hunch from blocking the view of other plausible drivers. | When a story carries business rules and exceptions, it brings clarity before implementation. It makes examples, open questions, and boundaries visible enough that the logic becomes jointly sound. | For a process, product, or service with noticeable failure risks, the method assesses possible failure modes in advance. It directs attention to combinations of occurrence, effect, and detectability. | When business rules need to become precise, it ties language, example, and test together. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as an Example Table and Acceptance Tests. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | High | Medium |
Timedifferent | 30-60 min | 30-60 min | 2-6 h | 60-90 min pro Feature |
Participantsdifferent | 2-8 | 3-7 | 3-10 | 3-6 |
Formatsame | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Fishbone Diagram, Cause Categories, Investigation Backlog | Example Map, Acceptance Criteria, Open Questions | FMEA Table, Risk Priority, Mitigation Actions | Example Table, Acceptance Tests |
Tagsno overlap | Root causeQualityOperations | Behavior-Driven DevelopmentRequirementsExamplesRefinement | RiskQualityOperationsRoot cause | AgileRequirementsExamplesBehavior-Driven Development |