methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper fishbone diagram with a measurable effect at the head and six labeled cause branches.
Operations
Fishbone Diagram
Paper illustration for ALPEN Method
Operations
ALPEN Method
Paper illustration of a branching impact map with a Why goal at the root, actor circles, How behavior changes and What options.
Product Strategy
Impact Mapping
Paper illustration for Failure Mode and Effects Analysis
Operations
Failure Mode and Effects Analysis
Purposedifferent
When a problem has several possible contributing factors, the method sorts causes by cause areas. It prevents an initial hunch from blocking the view of other plausible drivers.With an overloaded day full of too many tasks, a realistic picture of the day emerges. The method connects estimating, deciding, and buffer thinking so planning fits available energy and time.When a goal needs to be connected to several possible paths, it shows chains of impact instead of feature lists. It connects business goal, behavior change, and measures.For a process, product, or service with noticeable failure risks, the method assesses possible failure modes in advance. It directs attention to combinations of occurrence, effect, and detectability.
Complexitydifferent
LowLowMediumHigh
Timedifferent
30-60 min10-20 min daily45-90 min2-6 h
Participantsdifferent
2-813-83-10
Formatdifferent
WorkshopAsyncWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Fishbone Diagram, Cause Categories, Investigation BacklogDaily Plan, Time Estimates, Review NotesImpact Map, Outcome Hypotheses, Delivery OptionsFMEA Table, Risk Priority, Mitigation Actions
Tagsno overlap
Root causeQualityOperations
PlanningTime managementProductivityOperations
OutcomesStrategyBehaviorPlanning
RiskQualityOperationsRoot cause
Add more methods