methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper fishbone diagram with a measurable effect at the head and six labeled cause branches.
Operations
Fishbone Diagram
A structured reflection surfaces what was liked, learned, lacked, and longed for. It is a conversation format and does not validate actions automatically.
Agile
4Ls Retrospective
Paper illustration for Learning Review.
Operations
Learning Review
Paper illustration for Root Cause Tree Analysis
Operations
Root Cause Tree Analysis
Purposedifferent
When a problem has several possible contributing factors, the method sorts causes by cause areas. It prevents an initial hunch from blocking the view of other plausible drivers.When a sprint should not only be assessed but also learned from, it captures experience in clear learning categories. It records what worked, what's missing, and what should run differently next time.After a project phase with mixed results, the method makes learning from the individual case reusable. It connects events, decisions, and systemic conditions into robust insights.For a problem with several suspected causes, the method builds a causal structure instead of a mere list. It makes visible how causes connect and where the strongest points of leverage lie.
Complexitydifferent
LowLowMediumMedium
Timedifferent
30-60 min45–75 min1-3 h1-3 h
Participantsdifferent
2-8Team members involved3-102-8
Formatsame
WorkshopWorkshopWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Fishbone Diagram, Cause Categories, Investigation Backlog4Ls Board, Learning Themes, Improvement ActionsLearning Review Notes, System Factors, Improvement ActionsCause Tree, Evidence Notes, Countermeasures
Tagsno overlap
Root causeQualityOperations
RetrospectiveLearningReflectionTeam
LearningRetrospectiveIncidentOperations
Root causeTreeIncidentQuality
Add more methods