View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Operations Fishbone Diagram |  Agile 4Ls Retrospective |  Operations Failure Mode and Effects Analysis |  Agile Start Stop Continue |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a problem has several possible contributing factors, the method sorts causes by cause areas. It prevents an initial hunch from blocking the view of other plausible drivers. | When a sprint should not only be assessed but also learned from, it captures experience in clear learning categories. It records what worked, what's missing, and what should run differently next time. | For a process, product, or service with noticeable failure risks, the method assesses possible failure modes in advance. It directs attention to combinations of occurrence, effect, and detectability. | When a team wants to deliberately adjust its working behavior, it makes habits visible and assessable. It focuses on concrete changes instead of diffuse mood. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | High | Low |
Timedifferent | 30-60 min | 45–75 min | 2-6 h | 30-60 min |
Participantsdifferent | 2-8 | Team members involved | 3-10 | 3-12 |
Formatsame | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Fishbone Diagram, Cause Categories, Investigation Backlog | 4Ls Board, Learning Themes, Improvement Actions | FMEA Table, Risk Priority, Mitigation Actions | Start Stop Continue Board, Improvement Actions |
Tagsno overlap | Root causeQualityOperations | RetrospectiveLearningReflectionTeam | RiskQualityOperationsRoot cause | RetrospectiveImprovementTeamReflection |