methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
First-click Testing method illustration showing its working structure
UX Research
First-click Testing
Paper illustration of an IBIS map with issues, positions and arguments
Knowledge Modeling
IBIS
Paper illustration showing three sorted card stacks and an open question about a possible group.
UX Research
Card Sorting
Paper illustration for Argument Mapping
Decision Making
Argument Mapping
Purposedifferent
When users immediately turn the wrong way on a screen or wireframe, first click testing checks initial orientation at high speed. The first click shows early whether expectation, labeling, and wayfinding fit together.IBIS structures thinking about complex questions as a sequence of issues, ideas, and arguments. The method keeps discussions open without forcing them into premature consensus.When content only makes sense internally and users can't find the structure again, card sorting exposes their mental order. Terms, groups, and naming are then aligned with the target group's expectations.When statements, evidence, and counterarguments get mixed up, a debate quickly loses its structure. Argument Mapping breaks a thesis down into its reasoning and makes visible what it really rests on.
Complexitydifferent
LowMediumLowMedium
Timedifferent
1-2 Tage1-3 h20-45 min1-3 h
Participantsdifferent
10-302-8Based on research question1-8
Formatdifferent
AsyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Click Heatmap, Success Rate, Design RecommendationsIssue Map, Positions, Argument NotesContent groups, Label set, IA hypothesesArgument Map, Evidence Gaps, Decision Rationale
Tagsno overlap
UXNavigationFindabilityValidation
RationaleKnowledgeDecision
Information architectureNavigationStructure
SensemakingDecisionRationale
Add more methods