methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
First-click Testing method illustration showing its working structure
UX Research
First-click Testing
Empathy Mapping
UX Research
Empathy Mapping
Paper illustration showing three sorted card stacks and an open question about a possible group.
UX Research
Card Sorting
Paper illustration for Risk Storming.
Architecture
Risk Storming
Purposedifferent
When users immediately turn the wrong way on a screen or wireframe, first click testing checks initial orientation at high speed. The first click shows early whether expectation, labeling, and wayfinding fit together.When a lot is assumed about a target group but little is seen jointly, empathy mapping makes knowledge and gaps directly comparable. The picture also shows which assumptions hold up and where evidence is missing.When content only makes sense internally and users can't find the structure again, card sorting exposes their mental order. Terms, groups, and naming are then aligned with the target group's expectations.Helps clarify architecture context, options, and consequences in concrete terms. It organizes technical context, alternatives, and consequences. The result is captured as an Annotated Diagram, a Prioritized Risk List, and an Action Backlog.
Complexitysame
LowLowLowLow
Timedifferent
1-2 Tage30–60 min20-45 min60-90 min
Participantsdifferent
10-304-8Based on research question4-12
Formatdifferent
AsyncWorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Click Heatmap, Success Rate, Design RecommendationsEmpathy Map, Assumptions List, Research GapsContent groups, Label set, IA hypothesesAnnotated Diagram, Prioritized Risk List, Action Backlog
Tagsno overlap
UXNavigationFindabilityValidation
SynthesisQualitativeWorkshop
Information architectureNavigationStructure
RiskArchitectureWorkshopValidation
Add more methods