View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
Selected:Feynman TechniqueArchitecture Decision RecordSoftware Architecture CanvasConsensus Workshop
| Criterion |  Knowledge Modeling Feynman Technique |  Architecture Architecture Decision Record |  Architecture Software Architecture Canvas |  Facilitation Consensus Workshop |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | The Feynman Technique checks understanding by explaining a topic so that it stays easy for others to understand. It makes knowledge gaps visible before they become costly in everyday work. | An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable. | The Software Architecture Canvas reduces a system to the most important architecture decisions, constraints, and interfaces. It is useful when teams need a resilient overall picture quickly. | When a group needs a solid decision without outvoting individual factions, a Consensus Workshop creates a negotiable common ground. It makes agreement, reservations, and open tensions discussable at the same time. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 20-60 min | 15-45 min | 1-2 h | 1-3 h |
Participantsdifferent | 1 | 1-3 | 3-10 | 5-30 |
Formatdifferent | Async | Async | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Plain-language Explanation, Knowledge Gaps, Study Notes | ADR File, Decision Log, Rationale | Architecture Canvas, Goals, Constraints, Quality Attributes | Consensus Clusters, Theme Titles, Priority Areas |
Tagsno overlap | LearningKnowledgeUnderstanding | ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance | CanvasArchitectureAlignmentWorkshop | FacilitationConsensusWorkshopAlignment |