methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Fault Tree Analysis.
Operations
Fault Tree Analysis
Paper illustration for Failure Mode and Effects Analysis
Operations
Failure Mode and Effects Analysis
Paper illustration for ABC Analysis
Operations
ABC Analysis
Paper illustration for Pareto Analysis
Decision Making
Pareto Analysis
Purposedifferent
For a critical top event with several possible triggers, the method logically models failure paths. It makes visible which combinations of conditions can lead to damage.For a process, product, or service with noticeable failure risks, the method assesses possible failure modes in advance. It directs attention to combinations of occurrence, effect, and detectability.With many similar objects of differing economic significance, the method prioritizes effort by effect. It separates what needs regular steering from what rarely needs attention.In many problem situations, effect is distributed unequally across many causes. A Pareto Analysis separates the few drivers with high leverage from the long remainder and focuses attention on what measurably moves the needle.
Complexitydifferent
HighHighLowLow
Timedifferent
2-6 h2-6 h30-60 min30-60 min
Participantsdifferent
3-83-101-51-6
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopAsyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Fault Tree, Critical Paths, Cause Hypotheses, Control ActionsFMEA Table, Risk Priority, Mitigation ActionsABC Classification, Focus Rules, Control ListPareto Chart, Top Causes, Focus List
Tagsno overlap
RiskRoot causeSafety
RiskQualityOperationsRoot cause
PrioritizationOperationsPortfolio
PrioritizationQualityFocusRoot cause
Add more methods