methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Fault Tree Analysis.
Operations
Fault Tree Analysis
Paper illustration for Dot Estimation.
Facilitation
Dot Estimation
Paper illustration for Bucket System.
Agile
Bucket System
Paper illustration for Failure Mode and Effects Analysis
Operations
Failure Mode and Effects Analysis
Purposedifferent
For a critical top event with several possible triggers, the method logically models failure paths. It makes visible which combinations of conditions can lead to damage.When size or effort can only be estimated roughly, Dot Estimation condenses the group's experience into a quick range. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as an Effort Heatmap, Risk Signals, and Discussion Targets.When a large batch of work needs a fast, rough estimate, it sorts items into predefined size buckets. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as a Bucketed Backlog, Relative Estimates, and Split Candidates.For a process, product, or service with noticeable failure risks, the method assesses possible failure modes in advance. It directs attention to combinations of occurrence, effect, and detectability.
Complexitydifferent
HighLowMediumHigh
Timedifferent
2-6 h5-20 min30-90 min2-6 h
Participantsdifferent
3-83-203-123-10
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Fault Tree, Critical Paths, Cause Hypotheses, Control ActionsEffort Heatmap, Risk Signals, Discussion TargetsBucketed Backlog, Relative Estimates, Split CandidatesFMEA Table, Risk Priority, Mitigation Actions
Tagsno overlap
RiskRoot causeSafety
EstimationEffortRisk
EstimationBacklogRelative sizing
RiskQualityOperationsRoot cause
Add more methods