methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Fault Tree Analysis.
Operations
Fault Tree Analysis
Paper illustration of a calm four-quadrant Assumption Map with hypothesis cards and emphasis on important assumptions with little evidence.
Product Discovery
Assumption Mapping
Paper illustration for 8D Problem Solving.
Operations
8D Problem Solving
Paper illustration of Riskiest Assumption Test with a method-specific labelled workspace.
Product Discovery
Riskiest Assumption Test
Purposedifferent
For a critical top event with several possible triggers, the method logically models failure paths. It makes visible which combinations of conditions can lead to damage.When assumptions still sit unordered in the room, it weighs uncertainty against leverage. It makes visible which hypotheses should be checked first.For an acute quality or delivery problem, the method structures immediate protection and root cause work together. It keeps the situation stable while the actual cause is investigated cleanly.When an idea hinges on one critical unknown, it prioritizes testing that exact piece of uncertainty first. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence. The result is captured as a prioritized list of assumptions, a test plan, and a result report.
Complexitydifferent
HighMediumHighMedium
Timedifferent
2-6 h45-60 min1-6 Wochen1-2 Wochen pro Iteration
Participantsdifferent
3-82-84-102-6
Formatsame
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Fault Tree, Critical Paths, Cause Hypotheses, Control ActionsAssumption map, Test backlog, Risk ranking8D Report, Containment Plan, Root Cause Evidence, Corrective Action PlanPrioritized Assumption List, Test Plan, Results Report
Tagsno overlap
RiskRoot causeSafety
AssumptionsRiskExperimentsValidation
QualityProblem solvingRoot cause
ExperimentsValidationDiscoveryAssumptions
Add more methods