methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Fault Tree Analysis.
Operations
Fault Tree Analysis
Paper illustration for 8D Problem Solving.
Operations
8D Problem Solving
Paper illustration for Knowledge Mapping.
Knowledge Modeling
Knowledge Mapping
A 5 Whys working surface connects an observable problem with evidenced causes, marked uncertainty and concrete countermeasures with ownership.
Operations
5 Whys
Purposedifferent
For a critical top event with several possible triggers, the method logically models failure paths. It makes visible which combinations of conditions can lead to damage.For an acute quality or delivery problem, the method structures immediate protection and root cause work together. It keeps the situation stable while the actual cause is investigated cleanly.Knowledge Mapping makes knowledge, gaps, and transfer paths visible across a field. It fits when expertise should not just exist but also be findable and transferable.For a single, hard-to-explain deviation, the method exposes the causal chain behind the visible symptom. It keeps the cause open until a controllable condition emerges instead of a mere description.
Complexitydifferent
HighHighMediumLow
Timedifferent
2-6 h1-6 Wochen1-3 h15-30 min
Participantsdifferent
3-84-103-122-6
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Fault Tree, Critical Paths, Cause Hypotheses, Control Actions8D Report, Containment Plan, Root Cause Evidence, Corrective Action PlanKnowledge Map, Critical Knowledge Areas, Transfer PlanRoot cause notes, Countermeasures
Tagsno overlap
RiskRoot causeSafety
QualityProblem solvingRoot cause
KnowledgeMappingRisk
Root causeIncidentLeanProblem solving
Add more methods