methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Fake Door Test
Product Discovery
Fake Door Test
Paper illustration of a Test Card with four fields for hypothesis, test, metric, and success threshold.
Product Discovery
Test Card
Paper illustration of Goal Question Metric with its method-specific working model.
Engineering
Goal Question Metric
Paper illustration of KPI Tree with its method-specific working model.
Product Strategy
KPI Tree
Purposedifferent
When demand is still unclear, it measures interest in a feature before it is built. It separates real behavior from polite agreement and deliberately keeps build effort small.The Test Card turns a critical assumption into a testable claim and specifies in advance which result counts as success.Helps clarify technical problems, hypotheses, and next steps in concrete terms. It breaks a technical problem into testable parts. The result is captured as a GQM table and metric briefs.When metrics across the organization drift apart, it arranges drivers and effects under one shared logic. It connects customer value, product logic, and decision priorities. The result is captured as a KPI tree and owner list.
Complexitydifferent
MediumLowMediumMedium
Timedifferent
1-5 Tage20-35 min90-180 min90-180 min initial, dann laufend
Participantsdifferent
Nutzertraffic1-53-63-8
Formatdifferent
AsyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Click Data, Interest Signal, Learning DecisionTest Card with a pre-set thresholdGQM Table, Metric ProfilesKPI Tree, Owner List
Tagsno overlap
ValidationExperimentsDemandDiscovery
ExperimentsValidationDiscoveryHypothesis
MetricsMeasurementEngineeringAlignment
MetricsStrategyAlignmentMeasurement
Add more methods