methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Fake Door Test
Product Discovery
Fake Door Test
Paper illustration of a Test Card with four fields for hypothesis, test, metric, and success threshold.
Product Discovery
Test Card
Paper illustration of Goal Question Metric with its method-specific working model.
Engineering
Goal Question Metric
Paper illustration of Counter Metrics with its method-specific working model.
Product Strategy
Counter Metrics
Purposedifferent
When demand is still unclear, it measures interest in a feature before it is built. It separates real behavior from polite agreement and deliberately keeps build effort small.The Test Card turns a critical assumption into a testable claim and specifies in advance which result counts as success.Helps clarify technical problems, hypotheses, and next steps in concrete terms. It breaks a technical problem into testable parts. The result is captured as a GQM table and metric briefs.When a headline metric could mask side effects, it adds guardrail signals against unwanted outcomes. It connects customer value, product logic, and decision priorities. The result is captured as a counter-metric list and guardrail definitions.
Complexitydifferent
MediumLowMediumLow
Timedifferent
1-5 Tage20-35 min90-180 min30-60 min
Participantsdifferent
Nutzertraffic1-53-62-6
Formatdifferent
AsyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Click Data, Interest Signal, Learning DecisionTest Card with a pre-set thresholdGQM Table, Metric ProfilesCounter Metric List, Guardrail Definitions
Tagsno overlap
ValidationExperimentsDemandDiscovery
ExperimentsValidationDiscoveryHypothesis
MetricsMeasurementEngineeringAlignment
MetricsMeasurementStrategyExperiments
Add more methods