View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Engineering Failure Scenario Analysis | ![]() Decision Making Pre-Mortem | ![]() DevOps Game Day | ![]() Operations ALPEN Method |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | In critical processes, it is not enough to plan only for the normal case. Failure Scenario Analysis looks at the path into failure and shows which failures, chains, and control gaps cause the most damage. | In early initiatives with many uncertainties, planning quickly turns too optimistic. A pre-mortem makes the expected failure visible in advance and sharpens the view of causes, gaps, and countermeasures. | In preparing for rare incidents, the method tests response capability under controlled conditions. It shows where assumptions about stability, roles, and recovery are too optimistic. | With an overloaded day full of too many tasks, a realistic picture of the day emerges. The method connects estimating, deciding, and buffer thinking so planning fits available energy and time. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | High | Low |
Timedifferent | 1-3 h | 20–45 min | Halber Tag | 10-20 min daily |
Participantsdifferent | 3-8 | Small cross-functional group | 5-20 | 1 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop | Async |
Outputdifferent | Failure Scenarios, Risk Notes, Control Gaps, Test and Response Actions | Risk list, Mitigation plan, Assumption log | Simulation Notes, Gaps List, Updated Runbooks | Daily Plan, Time Estimates, Review Notes |
Tagsno overlap | FailureResilienceRisk | RiskDecisionFailurePlanning | ResilienceOperationsIncident | PlanningTime managementProductivityOperations |



