View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
Selected:Failure Scenario AnalysisArchitecture Decision RecordArchitecture Communication CanvasRAID Log
| Criterion | ![]() Engineering Failure Scenario Analysis | ![]() Architecture Architecture Decision Record | ![]() Architecture Architecture Communication Canvas | ![]() Delivery RAID Log |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | In critical processes, it is not enough to plan only for the normal case. Failure Scenario Analysis looks at the path into failure and shows which failures, chains, and control gaps cause the most damage. | An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable. | The Architecture Communication Canvas plans architecture communication so the right people receive the right message. The method turns technical complexity into deliberate communication design. | Helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, boundaries, and order steerable. The result is captured as a RAID Log and a source for status reporting. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 1-3 h | 15-45 min | 60-120 min | 30 min Setup, dann laufend |
Participantsdifferent | 3-8 | 1-3 | 2-8 | 1-3 maintaining, briefing for everyone |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Async | Workshop + async | Async |
Outputdifferent | Failure Scenarios, Risk Notes, Control Gaps, Test and Response Actions | ADR File, Decision Log, Rationale | Communication Canvas, Stakeholder Messages, Architecture Communication Plan | RAID Log, Status Report Source |
Tagsno overlap | FailureResilienceRisk | ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance | ArchitectureCommunicationStakeholdersCanvas | RiskTrackingStakeholdersGovernance |



