methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Expectation Mapping.
Facilitation
Expectation Mapping
Paper illustration of System Dynamics Simulation with its method-specific working model.
Systems Thinking
System Dynamics Simulation
Stock and Flow Diagram method illustration showing its working structure
Systems Thinking
Stock and Flow Diagram
Paper illustration for Alignment Mapping.
Facilitation
Alignment Mapping
Purposedifferent
When roles, interfaces, or projects fail because of differing expectations, Expectation Mapping surfaces these differences. It shows what each side takes for granted and where the pictures diverge.System Dynamics Simulation makes assumptions about time, delay, and feedback testable through experiments. It draws relationships, patterns, and feedback loops. The result is captured as a simulation model and scenario reports.A Stock and Flow Diagram shows how stocks, inflows, and outflows shape a system over time. It is especially suited when growth, delays, or capacity limits determine the dynamics.When several people work toward one goal but hold different mental maps, Alignment Mapping makes the discrepancies visible. It arranges goals, assumptions, and priorities so shared direction becomes verifiable.
Complexitydifferent
LowHighHighMedium
Timedifferent
45-90 minMehrere Tage bis Wochen2-6 h1-2 h
Participantsdifferent
3-121-5 Modellierende, Stakeholder asynchron1-64-12
Formatdifferent
WorkshopAsyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Expectation Map, Alignment Notes, AgreementsSimulation Model, Scenario ReportsStock and Flow Model, Dynamics Notes, Simulation HypothesesAlignment Map, Open Issues, Decision Questions
Tagsno overlap
AlignmentStakeholdersTeam
Systems thinkingDynamicsSimulationAnalysis
DynamicsSimulationFeedbackSystems thinking
AlignmentStakeholdersStrategyFacilitation
Add more methods