methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Expectation Mapping.
Facilitation
Expectation Mapping
Paper illustration for PDCA Cycle.
Operations
PDCA Cycle
Paper illustration for 8D Problem Solving.
Operations
8D Problem Solving
Paper illustration for Alignment Mapping.
Facilitation
Alignment Mapping
Purposedifferent
When roles, interfaces, or projects fail because of differing expectations, Expectation Mapping surfaces these differences. It shows what each side takes for granted and where the pictures diverge.For an improvement that still has to prove itself in everyday work, the method runs it through small learning loops. It connects planning, checking, and standardization into a repeatable learning mode.For an acute quality or delivery problem, the method structures immediate protection and root cause work together. It keeps the situation stable while the actual cause is investigated cleanly.When several people work toward one goal but hold different mental maps, Alignment Mapping makes the discrepancies visible. It arranges goals, assumptions, and priorities so shared direction becomes verifiable.
Complexitydifferent
LowLowHighMedium
Timedifferent
45-90 min1 h bis mehrere Wochen1-6 Wochen1-2 h
Participantsdifferent
3-121-84-104-12
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Expectation Map, Alignment Notes, AgreementsPDCA Log, Experiment Plan, Learning Outcome, Standard Change8D Report, Containment Plan, Root Cause Evidence, Corrective Action PlanAlignment Map, Open Issues, Decision Questions
Tagsno overlap
AlignmentStakeholdersTeam
Continuous improvementLeanExperiments
QualityProblem solvingRoot cause
AlignmentStakeholdersStrategyFacilitation
Add more methods