View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Agile Example Mapping | ![]() Delivery Value Stream Mapping | ![]() Product Discovery Dual-Track Agile | ![]() Delivery Monte Carlo Forecasting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a story carries business rules and exceptions, it brings clarity before implementation. It makes examples, open questions, and boundaries visible enough that the logic becomes jointly sound. | When delivery work dissolves into wait times, handoffs, and hidden effort, Value Stream Mapping makes the actual flow visible. The method exposes bottlenecks, idle time, and feedback loops so lead time and improvement levers become tangible. | When uncertainty and delivery run in parallel, it separates learning work from implementation while keeping both connected. It prevents unvalidated ideas from falling directly into the delivery stream. | Helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, boundaries, and order steerable. The result is captured as Forecast Percentiles, Throughput Dataset, and Risk Communication. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Medium | High |
Timedifferent | 30-60 min | 1-3 h | Laufend, Wochen bis Monate | 30-90 min Setup, danach laufend |
Participantsdifferent | 3-7 | 4-10 | 4-10 | 1-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Example Map, Acceptance Criteria, Open Questions | Current-state map, Future-state map, Bottleneck list | Discovery Backlog, Delivery Backlog, Experiment-Ergebnisse, Validierte Stories | Forecast Percentiles, Throughput Dataset, Risk Communication |
Tagsno overlap | Behavior-Driven DevelopmentRequirementsExamplesRefinement | LeanFlowWasteDelivery | AgileDiscoveryDelivery | ForecastingFlowDelivery |



