View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Agile Example Mapping |  Delivery Monte Carlo Forecasting |  Agile Specification by Example |  Product Discovery Dual-Track Agile |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a story carries business rules and exceptions, it brings clarity before implementation. It makes examples, open questions, and boundaries visible enough that the logic becomes jointly sound. | Helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, boundaries, and order steerable. The result is captured as Forecast Percentiles, Throughput Dataset, and Risk Communication. | When business rules need to become precise, it ties language, example, and test together. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as an Example Table and Acceptance Tests. | When uncertainty and delivery run in parallel, it separates learning work from implementation while keeping both connected. It prevents unvalidated ideas from falling directly into the delivery stream. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | High | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 30-60 min | 30-90 min Setup, danach laufend | 60-90 min pro Feature | Laufend, Wochen bis Monate |
Participantsdifferent | 3-7 | 1-8 | 3-6 | 4-10 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Example Map, Acceptance Criteria, Open Questions | Forecast Percentiles, Throughput Dataset, Risk Communication | Example Table, Acceptance Tests | Discovery Backlog, Delivery Backlog, Experiment-Ergebnisse, Validierte Stories |
Tagsno overlap | Behavior-Driven DevelopmentRequirementsExamplesRefinement | ForecastingFlowDelivery | AgileRequirementsExamplesBehavior-Driven Development | AgileDiscoveryDelivery |