View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Agile Example Mapping |  Facilitation Lean Coffee |  Agile Acceptance Criteria Workshop |  Knowledge Modeling Peer Instruction |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a story carries business rules and exceptions, it brings clarity before implementation. It makes examples, open questions, and boundaries visible enough that the logic becomes jointly sound. | When a group without a fixed agenda needs to get into useful conversations quickly, Lean Coffee structures the start around interests rather than a presentation. The group itself negotiates which topics get time first and which wait. | When a story needs clear checkpoints before implementation, it sharpens expectation and scope together. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as Acceptance Criteria and a Story Update. | Peer Instruction uses group thinking to clarify difficult terms or concepts faster. The method combines individual reflection with social correction and shared precision. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 30-60 min | 30-90 min | 20-40 min pro Story | 10-20 min je Frage |
Participantsdifferent | 3-7 | 3-20 | 3-6 | 6-50 |
Formatsame | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Example Map, Acceptance Criteria, Open Questions | Prioritized Topics, Discussion Notes, Action Items | Acceptance Criteria, Story Update | Concept Questions, Vote Results, Learning Notes |
Tagsno overlap | Behavior-Driven DevelopmentRequirementsExamplesRefinement | FacilitationAutonomyDialogue | AgileRequirementsRefinementBehavior-Driven Development | LearningDialogueFacilitation |