View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Systems Thinking Evaporating Cloud |  Facilitation World Café |  Systems Thinking Intervention Mapping |  Facilitation Lean Coffee |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | The method makes visible why two seemingly incompatible demands arise and which assumption must be tested to resolve the conflict. | When a group needs to connect many viewpoints in a short time, World Café creates a calm alternation between closeness and rotation. It sets thinking in motion without forcing the conversation into full-plenary rigidity. | Intervention Mapping translates a need for change into a planned, evaluable program. The method connects target group, determinants, actions, and measurement into a traceable chain. | When a group without a fixed agenda needs to get into useful conversations quickly, Lean Coffee structures the start around interests rather than a presentation. The group itself negotiates which topics get time first and which wait. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | High | Low |
Timedifferent | 60-120 min | 60-180 min | 1-5 Tage | 30-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 2-8 | 12-100+ | 4-12 | 3-20 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Conflict Cloud, Assumption List, Breakthrough Ideas, Next Experiments | Table Notes, Emergent Themes, Shared Questions | Logic Model, Change Objectives, Intervention Components, Evaluation Plan | Prioritized Topics, Discussion Notes, Action Items |
Tagsno overlap | Theory of ConstraintsAssumptionsSystems thinking | FacilitationDialogueLarge groupSensemaking | ChangeSystems thinkingCapability | FacilitationAutonomyDialogue |