View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Systems Thinking Evaporating Cloud |  Knowledge Modeling Peer Instruction |  Systems Thinking Future Reality Tree |  Facilitation Lean Coffee |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | The method makes visible why two seemingly incompatible demands arise and which assumption must be tested to resolve the conflict. | Peer Instruction uses group thinking to clarify difficult terms or concepts faster. The method combines individual reflection with social correction and shared precision. | A Future Reality Tree shows how desired actions are meant to lead to a better system state. The method checks whether a path of change holds together logically before time flows into implementation. | When a group without a fixed agenda needs to get into useful conversations quickly, Lean Coffee structures the start around interests rather than a presentation. The group itself negotiates which topics get time first and which wait. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | High | Low |
Timedifferent | 60-120 min | 10-20 min je Frage | 2-4 h | 30-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 2-8 | 6-50 | 3-8 | 3-20 |
Formatsame | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Conflict Cloud, Assumption List, Breakthrough Ideas, Next Experiments | Concept Questions, Vote Results, Learning Notes | Future Reality Tree, Negative Branches, Assumption List, Improved Injections | Prioritized Topics, Discussion Notes, Action Items |
Tagsno overlap | Theory of ConstraintsAssumptionsSystems thinking | LearningDialogueFacilitation | Theory of ConstraintsSystems thinkingChange | FacilitationAutonomyDialogue |