View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  UX Research Empathy Mapping |  Decision Making OODA Loop |  UX Research Affinity Diagramming |  Decision Making Delphi Method |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a lot is assumed about a target group but little is seen jointly, empathy mapping makes knowledge and gaps directly comparable. The picture also shows which assumptions hold up and where evidence is missing. | In dynamic situations, decisions become outdated faster than they can be prepared. The OODA Loop holds observing, orienting, deciding, and acting together as a recurring rhythm so reaction does not slide into inertia. | When research notes, feedback, or observations sit unconnected side by side, affinity diagramming sorts the raw material into solid themes. Many individual points turn into patterns that make decisions and opportunities clearer. | When knowledge is distributed and direct dominance should be avoided, groups quickly fall under the sway of their opinion leaders. The Delphi Method gathers assessments iteratively and gradually brings expert judgments closer together. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Low | High |
Timedifferent | 30–60 min | 15-60 min je Zyklus | 45–90 min | 1-4 Wochen |
Participantsdifferent | 4-8 | 1-8 | 3-10 | 6-30 Experten |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop | Async |
Outputdifferent | Empathy Map, Assumptions List, Research Gaps | Situation Assessment, Decision Loop, Action Updates | Theme clusters, Insight statements, Opportunity areas | Expert Forecast, Consensus Range, Assumption Notes |
Tagsno overlap | SynthesisQualitativeWorkshop | DecisionChangeLearningStrategy | SynthesisQualitativeRoot cause | ForecastingExpertsDecisionStrategy |