View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  UX Research Empathy Mapping |  Product Discovery Outcome-Driven Innovation |  Domain Modeling EventStorming |  Innovation Design Thinking |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a lot is assumed about a target group but little is seen jointly, empathy mapping makes knowledge and gaps directly comparable. The picture also shows which assumptions hold up and where evidence is missing. | Outcome-Driven Innovation clarifies customer problems, solution opportunities, and evidence. It separates jobs, desired outcomes, importance, satisfaction, and opportunity, and captures results as desired outcome statements, an opportunity landscape, and segments by underserved needs. | When a domain consists of many events, rules, and states, it creates a shared modeling space for the team. It bundles language, flows, and boundaries before domain knowledge fragments into siloed views. | For complex user problems with an uncertain cause, the method connects observation, interpretation, and experiment into a learning cycle. It keeps the focus on real needs and avoids premature solution language. This produces robust decisions for product and service. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | High | Medium | High |
Timedifferent | 30–60 min | Mehrere Wochen | 2-8 h | 1 Tag bis mehrere Wochen |
Participantsdifferent | 4-8 | 2-6 researchers plus sample | 5-12 | 4-10 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Empathy Map, Assumptions List, Research Gaps | Desired outcome statements, Opportunity landscape, Segmentation by underserved needs, Innovation hypotheses | Event Timeline, Ubiquitous Language, Boundaries, Open Questions | Problem Statement, Prototype, Test Learnings |
Tagsno overlap | SynthesisQualitativeWorkshop | OutcomesInnovationResearchQuantitative | Domain-Driven DesignEventsDiscoveryWorkshop | InnovationPrototypeResearch |