View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Decision Making Eisenhower Matrix |  Facilitation Dot Voting |  Decision Making Pareto Analysis |  Facilitation Consensus Workshop |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | It separates true priorities from noise so it becomes clear what should be done now, scheduled, delegated, or dropped. | When a workshop has produced too many options and the group needs to condense quickly, dot voting makes preferences visible in a short time. It bundles individual votes into a solid signal for the next selection. | In many problem situations, effect is distributed unequally across many causes. A Pareto Analysis separates the few drivers with high leverage from the long remainder and focuses attention on what measurably moves the needle. | When a group needs a solid decision without outvoting individual factions, a Consensus Workshop creates a negotiable common ground. It makes agreement, reservations, and open tensions discussable at the same time. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 15-30 min | 5-15 min | 30-60 min | 1-3 h |
Participantsdifferent | 1-6 | 3-20 | 1-6 | 5-30 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Eisenhower Matrix, Action List, Delegation Notes | Ranked list, Consensus signal, Shortlist | Pareto Chart, Top Causes, Focus List | Consensus Clusters, Theme Titles, Priority Areas |
Tagsno overlap | PrioritizationFocusTasks | FacilitationVotingConsensusPrioritization | PrioritizationQualityFocusRoot cause | FacilitationConsensusWorkshopAlignment |