View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Innovation Double Diamond |  Product Discovery Problem Interview |  Product Discovery Outcome-Driven Innovation |  Product Discovery Concierge MVP |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | For complex problems with a fuzzy situation, the method cleanly separates search space and decision. It first creates breadth in understanding and then focus in elaboration. This brings open questions, problem definition, and solution path into a traceable movement. | When the picture of the problem still needs to become solid, it asks about real situations and consequences. It separates genuine suffering from mere interest in a solution. | Outcome-Driven Innovation clarifies customer problems, solution opportunities, and evidence. It separates jobs, desired outcomes, importance, satisfaction, and opportunity, and captures results as desired outcome statements, an opportunity landscape, and segments by underserved needs. | When an idea can first fail or grow through genuine hands-on support, it relies on manual work instead of automation. It shows whether user value holds up even under manual execution. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | High | Medium |
Timedifferent | Wochen bis Monate | 30-60 min je Interview | Mehrere Wochen | 1-4 Wochen |
Participantsdifferent | 3-12 | 5-12 Interviews | 2-6 researchers plus sample | 3-10 Kunden |
Formatsame | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Problem Statement, Solution Options, Prototypes, Deliverables per Phase | Problem Evidence, Risk Notes, Customer Segments | Desired outcome statements, Opportunity landscape, Segmentation by underserved needs, Innovation hypotheses | Concierge Learnings, Service Blueprint, MVP Risks |
Tagsno overlap | ProcessDivergenceInnovation | DiscoveryInterviewsValidation | OutcomesInnovationResearchQuantitative | MVPValidationServiceDiscovery |