View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Facilitation Dot Voting |  Facilitation World Café |  Innovation Round Robin Brainstorming |  Facilitation Fishbowl Discussion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a workshop has produced too many options and the group needs to condense quickly, dot voting makes preferences visible in a short time. It bundles individual votes into a solid signal for the next selection. | When a group needs to connect many viewpoints in a short time, World Café creates a calm alternation between closeness and rotation. It sets thinking in motion without forcing the conversation into full-plenary rigidity. | With unevenly distributed speaking time, the method brings every person into the contribution one after another. It prevents early voices from setting the direction while still producing a shared idea space. This makes participation plannable and the team's diversity visible. | When a controversial topic needs depth and discipline at the same time, Fishbowl Discussion makes the structure of the conversation transparent. The format keeps the core small enough for real dialogue and open enough for controlled turnover. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 5-15 min | 60-180 min | 20-45 min | 45-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-20 | 12-100+ | 4-10 | 8-80 |
Formatsame | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Ranked list, Consensus signal, Shortlist | Table Notes, Emergent Themes, Shared Questions | Idea List, Cluster, Shortlist | Discussion Insights, Observed Tensions, Follow-up Questions |
Tags1 shared | FacilitationVotingConsensusPrioritization | FacilitationDialogueLarge groupSensemaking | BrainstormingIdeationFacilitationInclusionCreativity | FacilitationDialogueLarge group |