View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Facilitation Dot Voting |  UX Research Surveys |  Facilitation 1-2-4-All |  Product Discovery Outcome-Driven Innovation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a workshop has produced too many options and the group needs to condense quickly, dot voting makes preferences visible in a short time. It bundles individual votes into a solid signal for the next selection. | When a topic needs to be validated broadly and many people can answer the same question, surveys gather structured feedback in a scalable form. Answers become comparable and segmentable instead of remaining merely anecdotal. | When many people in a group too rarely get to speak, 1-2-4-All distributes thinking time more fairly. The format builds participation step by step and makes quiet or still-unformed thoughts usable faster. | Outcome-Driven Innovation clarifies customer problems, solution opportunities, and evidence. It separates jobs, desired outcomes, importance, satisfaction, and opportunity, and captures results as desired outcome statements, an opportunity landscape, and segments by underserved needs. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Low | High |
Timedifferent | 5-15 min | 3-14 Tage | 10-20 min | Mehrere Wochen |
Participantsdifferent | 3-20 | 50+ | 4-100+ | 2-6 researchers plus sample |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Async | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Ranked list, Consensus signal, Shortlist | Survey Results, Charts, Segment Insights | Idea List, Shared Insights, Emergent Themes | Desired outcome statements, Opportunity landscape, Segmentation by underserved needs, Innovation hypotheses |
Tagsno overlap | FacilitationVotingConsensusPrioritization | QuantitativeResearchValidation | FacilitationInclusionIdeation | OutcomesInnovationResearchQuantitative |