View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Facilitation Dot Voting |  Innovation SCAMPER |  Facilitation Nominal Group Technique |  Innovation Lotus Blossom |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a workshop has produced too many options and the group needs to condense quickly, dot voting makes preferences visible in a short time. It bundles individual votes into a solid signal for the next selection. | For an existing solution under pressure to change, the method deliberately opens space for systematic variants. It directs attention to rebuilding, combining, and repurposing rather than only new basic ideas. This produces concrete evolution paths for products, offerings, or workflows. | When loud voices could dominate a round, Nominal Group Technique protects individual thinking time from group effects. It collects ideas separately first and only then enables shared weighting. | When a central question feels too large, the method breaks it into neighboring topic fields with their own depth of ideation. It holds structure and openness at the same time, so adjacent perspectives don't get lost. This grows an idea space out of a core problem. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 5-15 min | 30-60 min | 60-120 min | 45-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-20 | 2-10 | 5-12 | 3-10 |
Formatsame | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Ranked list, Consensus signal, Shortlist | SCAMPER Idea List, Concept Shortlist, Variation Notes | Ranked Ideas, Clarified Options, Group Priority | Lotus Diagram, Idea Themes, Shortlist |
Tagsno overlap | FacilitationVotingConsensusPrioritization | BrainstormingIdeationCreativityReframingInnovation | FacilitationPrioritizationVotingInclusion | BrainstormingIdeationCreativityDivergenceWorkshop |