View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Facilitation Dot Voting |  Architecture Architecture Inception Canvas |  Facilitation Nominal Group Technique |  Architecture Software Architecture Canvas |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a workshop has produced too many options and the group needs to condense quickly, dot voting makes preferences visible in a short time. It bundles individual votes into a solid signal for the next selection. | The Architecture Inception Canvas bundles the first architecture questions into a compact decision picture. It fits when an initiative is still in motion but still needs clear guardrails. | When loud voices could dominate a round, Nominal Group Technique protects individual thinking time from group effects. It collects ideas separately first and only then enables shared weighting. | The Software Architecture Canvas reduces a system to the most important architecture decisions, constraints, and interfaces. It is useful when teams need a resilient overall picture quickly. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 5-15 min | 1-2 h | 60-120 min | 1-2 h |
Participantsdifferent | 3-20 | 3-8 | 5-12 | 3-10 |
Formatsame | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Ranked list, Consensus signal, Shortlist | Inception Canvas, Risks, Goal List, Open Questions | Ranked Ideas, Clarified Options, Group Priority | Architecture Canvas, Goals, Constraints, Quality Attributes |
Tagsno overlap | FacilitationVotingConsensusPrioritization | AlignmentArchitectureCanvas | FacilitationPrioritizationVotingInclusion | CanvasArchitectureAlignmentWorkshop |