View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Facilitation Dot Estimation |  Architecture Views and Beyond |  Agile Ideal Days |  Architecture Architecture Decision Record |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When size or effort can only be estimated roughly, Dot Estimation condenses the group's experience into a quick range. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as an Effort Heatmap, Risk Signals, and Discussion Targets. | Views and Beyond organizes architecture into several views so no single diagram has to do everything at once. This makes it possible to choose the representation that fits the stakeholder's question. | When effort needs to be thought of as real working time, it offers a simple common denominator for comparison. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as Ideal Day Estimates, Assumption Notes, and Capacity Caveats. | An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 5-20 min | 1-3 Tage | 15-60 min | 15-45 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-20 | 1-4 | 2-9 | 1-3 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Async |
Outputdifferent | Effort Heatmap, Risk Signals, Discussion Targets | Architecture Views, Cross-view Notes, Rationale | Ideal Day Estimates, Assumption Notes, Capacity Caveats | ADR File, Decision Log, Rationale |
Tagsno overlap | EstimationEffortRisk | DocumentationStakeholdersArchitecture | EstimationEffortAgile | ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance |