methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Dot Estimation.
Facilitation
Dot Estimation
Three Amigos method illustration showing its working structure
Agile
Three Amigos
Paper illustration for Failure Mode and Effects Analysis
Operations
Failure Mode and Effects Analysis
Paper illustration of Acceptance Criteria Workshop with a method-specific labelled workspace.
Agile
Acceptance Criteria Workshop
Purposedifferent
When size or effort can only be estimated roughly, Dot Estimation condenses the group's experience into a quick range. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as an Effort Heatmap, Risk Signals, and Discussion Targets.When story, test, and implementation could drift apart, it brings business perspective, engineering, and quality together early. It prevents a story from being read differently only late in the process.For a process, product, or service with noticeable failure risks, the method assesses possible failure modes in advance. It directs attention to combinations of occurrence, effect, and detectability.When a story needs clear checkpoints before implementation, it sharpens expectation and scope together. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as Acceptance Criteria and a Story Update.
Complexitydifferent
LowLowHighLow
Timedifferent
5-20 min15-30 min2-6 h20-40 min pro Story
Participantsdifferent
3-2033-103-6
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Effort Heatmap, Risk Signals, Discussion TargetsClarified Story, Test Examples, Open QuestionsFMEA Table, Risk Priority, Mitigation ActionsAcceptance Criteria, Story Update
Tagsno overlap
EstimationEffortRisk
CollaborationBehavior-Driven DevelopmentQualityRefinement
RiskQualityOperationsRoot cause
AgileRequirementsRefinementBehavior-Driven Development
Add more methods