methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Dot Estimation.
Facilitation
Dot Estimation
Systems Mapping method illustration showing its working structure
Systems Thinking
Systems Mapping
Paper illustration for Fake Door Test
Product Discovery
Fake Door Test
Paper illustration of MVP Test Matrix with a method-specific labelled workspace.
Product Discovery
MVP Test Matrix
Purposedifferent
When size or effort can only be estimated roughly, Dot Estimation condenses the group's experience into a quick range. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as an Effort Heatmap, Risk Signals, and Discussion Targets.Systems Mapping arranges elements, relationships, and boundaries so a complex field becomes legible at a glance. The overview stabilizes the overall picture before detail work or steering begins.When demand is still unclear, it measures interest in a feature before it is built. It separates real behavior from polite agreement and deliberately keeps build effort small.When several minimal variants compete to answer the same question, it makes comparing and choosing between them cleaner. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence. The result is captured as a Test Matrix and a Test Plan.
Complexitydifferent
LowMediumMediumMedium
Timedifferent
5-20 min1-3 h1-5 Tage45-75 min
Participantsdifferent
3-203-12Nutzertraffic2-8
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshop + asyncAsyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Effort Heatmap, Risk Signals, Discussion TargetsSystem Map, Dependencies, Leverage PointsClick Data, Interest Signal, Learning DecisionTest Matrix, Test Plan
Tagsno overlap
EstimationEffortRisk
Systems thinkingMappingBoundariesChange
ValidationExperimentsDemandDiscovery
ExperimentsValidationDiscoveryOptions
Add more methods