View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Facilitation Dot Estimation | ![]() Business Strategy Scenario Planning | ![]() Agile Ideal Days | ![]() Product Strategy Impact Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When size or effort can only be estimated roughly, Dot Estimation condenses the group's experience into a quick range. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as an Effort Heatmap, Risk Signals, and Discussion Targets. | Scenario Planning opens the view to several plausible futures instead of a single forecast. The method protects strategies from depending on too narrow an expected path. | When effort needs to be thought of as real working time, it offers a simple common denominator for comparison. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as Ideal Day Estimates, Assumption Notes, and Capacity Caveats. | When a goal needs to be connected to several possible paths, it shows chains of impact instead of feature lists. It connects business goal, behavior change, and measures. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | High | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 5-20 min | 0.5-2 Tage | 15-60 min | 45-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-20 | 4-12 | 2-9 | 3-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Effort Heatmap, Risk Signals, Discussion Targets | Scenario Set, Strategic Implications, Robust Options | Ideal Day Estimates, Assumption Notes, Capacity Caveats | Impact Map, Outcome Hypotheses, Delivery Options |
Tagsno overlap | EstimationEffortRisk | StrategyUncertaintyPlanning | EstimationEffortAgile | OutcomesStrategyBehaviorPlanning |



