View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Facilitation Dot Estimation |  Agile ROAM Board |  Facilitation Team Charter |  Agile Planning Poker |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When size or effort can only be estimated roughly, Dot Estimation condenses the group's experience into a quick range. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as an Effort Heatmap, Risk Signals, and Discussion Targets. | When work needs to move between different states or columns, it makes that movement and its handoffs legible. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as a ROAM Board and an Owner List. | When a team is starting fresh or working past each other, Team Charter clarifies the shared working basis. It visibly sets out how collaboration, decision paths, and mutual conduct should work day to day. | When estimates within the team diverge too much, it puts differing expectations on a common test bench. It separates rough complexity from unspoken assumptions. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 5-20 min | 20-40 min initial, dann laufend | 2-4 h | 2-5 min je Item |
Participantsdifferent | 3-20 | 3-15 | 3-12 | 3-9 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Effort Heatmap, Risk Signals, Discussion Targets | ROAM Board, Owner List | Team Charter, Working Norms, Role Notes | Relative Estimates, Assumption Notes, Split Candidates |
Tagsno overlap | EstimationEffortRisk | RiskAgileTrackingAlignment | TeamAlignmentCollaboration | EstimationAgileRelative sizingTeam |