View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Facilitation Dot Estimation |  Decision Making Risk Matrix |  Facilitation Dot Voting |  Delivery Cost of Delay |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When size or effort can only be estimated roughly, Dot Estimation condenses the group's experience into a quick range. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as an Effort Heatmap, Risk Signals, and Discussion Targets. | When a project faces many possible disruptions, it quickly becomes unclear which risks deserve attention first. It separates options, evaluation criteria, and open risks. The result is captured as a Risk Matrix and a Top Risk List. | When a workshop has produced too many options and the group needs to condense quickly, dot voting makes preferences visible in a short time. It bundles individual votes into a solid signal for the next selection. | Helps clarify scope, order, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, constraints, and sequence manageable. The result is captured as a Cost of Delay table and prioritization sequence. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | Low | High |
Timedifferent | 5-20 min | 30-60 min | 5-15 min | 90-180 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-20 | 3-10 | 3-20 | 3-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Effort Heatmap, Risk Signals, Discussion Targets | Risk Matrix, Top Risk List | Ranked list, Consensus signal, Shortlist | CoD Table, Prioritization Sequence |
Tagsno overlap | EstimationEffortRisk | RiskDecisionPrioritizationAssessment | FacilitationVotingConsensusPrioritization | PrioritizationDeliveryEconomicsDecision |