View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Facilitation Dot Estimation |  Facilitation Nominal Group Technique |  Delivery RAID Log |  Facilitation Stakeholder Salience Model |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When size or effort can only be estimated roughly, Dot Estimation condenses the group's experience into a quick range. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as an Effort Heatmap, Risk Signals, and Discussion Targets. | When loud voices could dominate a round, Nominal Group Technique protects individual thinking time from group effects. It collects ideas separately first and only then enables shared weighting. | Helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, boundaries, and order steerable. The result is captured as a RAID Log and a source for status reporting. | When stakeholders appear to matter very differently, the Stakeholder Salience Model rates their actual priority through power, legitimacy, and urgency. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as a Salience diagram and a class-based strategy. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 5-20 min | 60-120 min | 30 min Setup, dann laufend | 60-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-20 | 5-12 | 1-3 maintaining, briefing for everyone | 3-6 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop | Async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Effort Heatmap, Risk Signals, Discussion Targets | Ranked Ideas, Clarified Options, Group Priority | RAID Log, Status Report Source | Salience Diagram, Strategy per Class |
Tagsno overlap | EstimationEffortRisk | FacilitationPrioritizationVotingInclusion | RiskTrackingStakeholdersGovernance | StakeholdersFacilitationAlignmentGovernance |