View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Facilitation Dot Estimation | ![]() Delivery Cost of Delay | ![]() Decision Making Delphi Method | ![]() Decision Making Risk Matrix |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When size or effort can only be estimated roughly, Dot Estimation condenses the group's experience into a quick range. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as an Effort Heatmap, Risk Signals, and Discussion Targets. | Helps clarify scope, order, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, constraints, and sequence manageable. The result is captured as a Cost of Delay table and prioritization sequence. | When knowledge is distributed and direct dominance should be avoided, groups quickly fall under the sway of their opinion leaders. The Delphi Method gathers assessments iteratively and gradually brings expert judgments closer together. | When a project faces many possible disruptions, it quickly becomes unclear which risks deserve attention first. It separates options, evaluation criteria, and open risks. The result is captured as a Risk Matrix and a Top Risk List. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | High | High | Low |
Timedifferent | 5-20 min | 90-180 min | 1-4 Wochen | 30-60 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-20 | 3-8 | 6-30 Experten | 3-10 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop | Async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Effort Heatmap, Risk Signals, Discussion Targets | CoD Table, Prioritization Sequence | Expert Forecast, Consensus Range, Assumption Notes | Risk Matrix, Top Risk List |
Tagsno overlap | EstimationEffortRisk | PrioritizationDeliveryEconomicsDecision | ForecastingExpertsDecisionStrategy | RiskDecisionPrioritizationAssessment |



