methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Dot Estimation.
Facilitation
Dot Estimation
Paper illustration for ALPEN Method
Operations
ALPEN Method
Paper illustration for Ideal Days.
Agile
Ideal Days
Paper illustration for Failure Mode and Effects Analysis
Operations
Failure Mode and Effects Analysis
Purposedifferent
When size or effort can only be estimated roughly, Dot Estimation condenses the group's experience into a quick range. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as an Effort Heatmap, Risk Signals, and Discussion Targets.With an overloaded day full of too many tasks, a realistic picture of the day emerges. The method connects estimating, deciding, and buffer thinking so planning fits available energy and time.When effort needs to be thought of as real working time, it offers a simple common denominator for comparison. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as Ideal Day Estimates, Assumption Notes, and Capacity Caveats.For a process, product, or service with noticeable failure risks, the method assesses possible failure modes in advance. It directs attention to combinations of occurrence, effect, and detectability.
Complexitydifferent
LowLowLowHigh
Timedifferent
5-20 min10-20 min daily15-60 min2-6 h
Participantsdifferent
3-2012-93-10
Formatdifferent
WorkshopAsyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Effort Heatmap, Risk Signals, Discussion TargetsDaily Plan, Time Estimates, Review NotesIdeal Day Estimates, Assumption Notes, Capacity CaveatsFMEA Table, Risk Priority, Mitigation Actions
Tagsno overlap
EstimationEffortRisk
PlanningTime managementProductivityOperations
EstimationEffortAgile
RiskQualityOperationsRoot cause
Add more methods