View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Knowledge Modeling Domain Storytelling |  Delivery Shape Up |  Domain Modeling Context Map |  Business Strategy GAP Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | Domain Storytelling translates domain knowledge into a shared narrative of actors, objects, and workflows. It is especially useful when language, rules, and process understanding must be tightly connected. | Shape Up helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow. It makes work boundaries and decisions explicit and captures results as pitches, bet-table decisions, and hill charts. | When several contexts need to talk to each other, it makes their relationships and dependencies legible. It helps sort integration pressure and responsibilities across system boundaries. | GAP Analysis compares the current state with a target picture and makes the distance manageable. It becomes useful when, ahead of new initiatives, it must become clear which capabilities, processes, or resources are missing. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 1-2 h | 6 Wochen Cycle + 2 Wochen Cool-Down | 1-3 h | 1-3 h |
Participantsdifferent | 2-8 | 2-4 pro Pitch | 2-8 | 2-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Domain Story, Glossary Notes, Process Narrative | Pitches, Bet-table decisions, Hill charts, Cooldown outcomes | Context Map, Integration Patterns, Boundary Notes | Gap Matrix, Action Plan, Risk Notes |
Tagsno overlap | KnowledgeDomain-Driven DesignProcess | PlanningDeliveryAutonomy | Domain-Driven DesignBoundariesStrategy | StrategyAnalysisPlanning |