View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Knowledge Modeling Domain Storytelling |  Facilitation Fishbowl Discussion |  Facilitation Lean Coffee |  Knowledge Modeling Peer Instruction |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | Domain Storytelling translates domain knowledge into a shared narrative of actors, objects, and workflows. It is especially useful when language, rules, and process understanding must be tightly connected. | When a controversial topic needs depth and discipline at the same time, Fishbowl Discussion makes the structure of the conversation transparent. The format keeps the core small enough for real dialogue and open enough for controlled turnover. | When a group without a fixed agenda needs to get into useful conversations quickly, Lean Coffee structures the start around interests rather than a presentation. The group itself negotiates which topics get time first and which wait. | Peer Instruction uses group thinking to clarify difficult terms or concepts faster. The method combines individual reflection with social correction and shared precision. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 1-2 h | 45-90 min | 30-90 min | 10-20 min je Frage |
Participantsdifferent | 2-8 | 8-80 | 3-20 | 6-50 |
Formatsame | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Domain Story, Glossary Notes, Process Narrative | Discussion Insights, Observed Tensions, Follow-up Questions | Prioritized Topics, Discussion Notes, Action Items | Concept Questions, Vote Results, Learning Notes |
Tagsno overlap | KnowledgeDomain-Driven DesignProcess | FacilitationDialogueLarge group | FacilitationAutonomyDialogue | LearningDialogueFacilitation |