methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for DMAIC.
Operations
DMAIC
Paper illustration of an IBIS map with issues, positions and arguments
Knowledge Modeling
IBIS
Paper fishbone diagram with a measurable effect at the head and six labeled cause branches.
Operations
Fishbone Diagram
Paper illustration for Argument Mapping
Decision Making
Argument Mapping
Purposedifferent
For a process problem with fluctuating performance, the method brings analysis and improvement into a disciplined sequence. It creates a framework in which numbers, causes, and control come together.IBIS structures thinking about complex questions as a sequence of issues, ideas, and arguments. The method keeps discussions open without forcing them into premature consensus.When a problem has several possible contributing factors, the method sorts causes by cause areas. It prevents an initial hunch from blocking the view of other plausible drivers.When statements, evidence, and counterarguments get mixed up, a debate quickly loses its structure. Argument Mapping breaks a thesis down into its reasoning and makes visible what it really rests on.
Complexitydifferent
HighMediumLowMedium
Timedifferent
2-12 Wochen1-3 h30-60 min1-3 h
Participantsdifferent
3-102-82-81-8
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Project Charter, Measurement Plan, Cause Analysis, Control PlanIssue Map, Positions, Argument NotesFishbone Diagram, Cause Categories, Investigation BacklogArgument Map, Evidence Gaps, Decision Rationale
Tagsno overlap
Continuous improvementQualityProcess improvement
RationaleKnowledgeDecision
Root causeQualityOperations
SensemakingDecisionRationale
Add more methods