methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for DMAIC.
Operations
DMAIC
Decision Tree method illustration showing its working structure
Decision Making
Decision Tree
Paper matrix with six colored hat cards for information, feeling, value, caution, ideas and process control.
Facilitation
Six Thinking Hats
Paper illustration for Root Cause Tree Analysis
Operations
Root Cause Tree Analysis
Purposedifferent
For a process problem with fluctuating performance, the method brings analysis and improvement into a disciplined sequence. It creates a framework in which numbers, causes, and control come together.For decisions with follow-on paths and dependencies, a linear comparison is often not enough. A Decision Tree shows how options branch under conditions and which consequences hang on each branch.When a topic gets stuck too quickly in the same thinking mode, Six Thinking Hats deliberately separates the perspectives. This means facts, risks, creativity, and emotional signals get worked through one after another instead of mixed together.For a problem with several suspected causes, the method builds a causal structure instead of a mere list. It makes visible how causes connect and where the strongest points of leverage lie.
Complexitydifferent
HighMediumMediumMedium
Timedifferent
2-12 Wochen30-90 min45-90 min1-3 h
Participantsdifferent
3-101-64-122-8
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Project Charter, Measurement Plan, Cause Analysis, Control PlanDecision Tree, Option Map, Assumption ListPerspective Notes, Decision Inputs, Action ItemsCause Tree, Evidence Notes, Countermeasures
Tagsno overlap
Continuous improvementQualityProcess improvement
DecisionTreeOptions
FacilitationOptionsDecision
Root causeTreeIncidentQuality
Add more methods