View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Product Strategy DIBB | ![]() Decision Making Trade-off Analysis | ![]() Decision Making Option Framing | ![]() Decision Making Decision Matrix |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | DIBB helps clarify target groups, value, goals, and priorities by making the logic behind a decision explicit. It captures results as a DIBB document, belief list, bet list, and learning report. | With limited resources, quality, speed, cost, and risk almost always compete with each other. Trade-off Analysis makes these tensions explicit and prevents decisions from producing hidden side effects. | In early decisions, alternatives are often still vague, incomplete, or blended together. Option Framing brings every possibility into a comparable form and makes visible which variant actually fits the question. | When several options collide with several criteria, comparison quickly becomes subjective. A Decision Matrix makes the trade-off visible and brings weighting, criteria, and options into a shared logic. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 1-2 h | 45-120 min | 45-120 min | 45-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 2-8 | 2-8 | 3-8 | 2-8 |
Formatsame | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | DIBB document, Belief list, Bet list, Learning report | Trade-off Matrix, Criteria List, Decision Rationale, Accepted Downsides | Option Frames, Assumption Notes, Comparable Shortlist, Decision Inputs | Decision Matrix, Scoring Rationale, Selected Option |
Tagsno overlap | StrategyDecisionAssumptionsHypothesis | TradeoffsDecisionCriteriaOptions | OptionsDecision framingStrategyComparison | DecisionCriteriaScoringTradeoffs |



